-
I’m trying to use the problemMatch defined here in It doesn’t seem to work, you can see the log output here: https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/pull/19038/checks?check_run_id=711757943#step:21:130 In that PR I’ve also tried with a different matcher (which doesn’t work either): https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/pull/19038/files#diff-8aa942dcc12e296fcb1cbf95181de009R7 Testing the patterns in javascript with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments
-
@billyvg, actions/setup-python/blob/807b74f98ca701f414ddaa8a4187e7cffa93cbbd/src/setup-python.ts
This file has been truncated. show original |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@brightran Right, so by using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@billyvg, > I’m not so sure if the 2nd matcher works
if you add another Problem Matchers (using the ::add-matcher:: command) after executing the setup-python action in your workflow, the new Problem Matchers should become the only Problem Matchers in work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@billyvg,
github.comMaybe you can try to reference the below file in
actions/setup-python
to add-matcher:actions/setup-python/blob/807b74f98ca701f414ddaa8a4187e7cffa93cbbd/src/setup-python.ts