No more than 10 inputs for reusable workflows? #26781
-
I am hitting what seems like an odd limit. I am only able to pass up to 10 inputs to a
I can see why this limitation would make sense for Trying to make a reusable workflow with some flexibility, with only 10 inputs seems like it would be difficult. Is this actually by design? Or am I hitting a bug |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 8 comments 2 replies
-
Hi @joshua-hancox_fedex, I’m the product manager for reusable workflows. You’ve run into a bug. The limit should be much higher. I’ve opened an internal issue for the team to investigate. Thanks for letting us know. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Cool, thankyou for the quick response. :slight_smile: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @joshua-hancox_fedex, we’ve removed the limit on the number of inputs that can be defined for a reusable workflow. See if that works for you! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes testing and working OK. Thankyou. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Sorry to post on an old discussion, but I just hit this same error message:
Is the limit back? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've just run into the same issue:
Any updates on that? We need at least 15-20 inputs for our deployment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@jenschelkopf Would you mind to pass the issue to the team with a high priority please? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Any update on this...? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @joshua-hancox_fedex, I’m the product manager for reusable workflows. You’ve run into a bug. The limit should be much higher. I’ve opened an internal issue for the team to investigate. Thanks for letting us know.