GH Code Scanning: 1 Analysis Not Found #24662
-
I recently deleted my CodeQL analysis file ( Clicking on the “Details”: My repository is a Go project and my
Does anyone know how to get rid of the empty check? I have lots of info available and I can provide more info if it is needed. Thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 7 comments
-
I would cheat by creating a new empty repo, git pushing the same git repository contents into it, and then swapping the repo names (and eventually deleting the original repository). This of course isn’t a great strategy if one has forks/stars, in which case I’d contact: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for your reply! I’ve thought about that before, but I have around 300 stars and I don’t want to lose them, so this would probably not work for me. Thanks though. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the detailed description of the problem you’re facing.
That should ensure that any PR against |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hmmm, I just tried that but it still shows a neutral check. For example, test by evanyiwensu · Pull Request #54 · HACKERALERT/Picocrypt · GitHub. I’m not sure what the culprit is, but thanks for helping me make some progress :slight_smile: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If we look at test by evanyiwensu · Pull Request #54 · HACKERALERT/Picocrypt · GitHub, we see the following:
So it looks like things are working correctly for your Go analysis, and for Python there are existing analysis results on |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you for the clear and concise response! I will just leave it as is since it seems like there’s a lot to do to get rid of the notices. Thanks for your help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
If we look at test by evanyiwensu · Pull Request #54 · HACKERALERT/Picocrypt · GitHub, we see the following:
So it looks like things are working correctly for your Go analysis, and for Python there are existing analysis results on
main
(probably from earlier) but not on the PR (because the PR workflow doesn’t include Python anymore). This looks reasonable. You can leave things as they are without any significant impact to your checks/alerts. If you want to cl…